Twists of a Theme Self / Other’s with Regard to Shostakovich’s Рiano Cycle «Aphorisms» (оp.13) and Three Fugues (1934)

Larissa L. Gerver

Abstract


The opposition self / other’s appears in different ways in Schostakovich’s pieces. In the «Aphorisms»  the other’s  appears in the form of musical topoi corresponding to the names of the pieces: 1. Recitative, 2. Serenade, 3. Nocturne etc.   The self is shown by Shostakovich’s words about «Aphorisms» that «they are covered by one idea». As shown in this article, this is the C major scale gradually comprising from piece to piece — the  fundamental element of music in composition with the  complex  harmony  language. 

Three Fugues are in process of publication in the New collected works by Shostakovich (DSCH Publishers). According to composer’s words he was writing these «extremely boring fugues» «to carry out some technical exercises», «like exercises of a pianist or trombonist». In the paper Three fugues are treated as examples of a changing Shostakovich’s  attitude  to the fugue, which was the self  during the period of study in Conservatory, the other’s after graduation and become the self again when he composed  Three fugues.

Keywords: D.D. Shostakovich, creative method, fugue


References


THE MANUSCRIPT SOURCES

Shostakovich D.D. Aforizmy. Pervyj variant chistovoj rukopisi. VMOMK, f. 146, B. Yavorskij, ed. hr. 241.

Shostakovich D.D. [Tri fugi]. Avtograf. RGALI, f. 2038, op. 1, ed. hr. 36, s. 1–4.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Gasparov M.L. Aforizm // Literaturnaya ehnciklopediya terminov i ponyatij / Glav. red. i sost. A.N. Nikolyukin. M.: Intelvak, 2001. S. 43.

Gerver L.L. 24 prelyudii i fugi D.D. Shostakovicha // Novoe sobranie sochinenij Dmitriya SHostakovicha. T. 113. M.: DSCH, 2015. S. 217–222.

Gerver L.L. [24 prelyudii i fugi D.D. Shostakovicha.] Opisanie rukopisnyh istochnikov // Novoe sobranie sochinenij Dmitriya SHostakovicha. T. 113. M.: DSCH, 2015. S. 283–292.

Digonskaya O.G. Shostakovich v seredine 1930-h: opernye plany i voploshcheniya. Ob atribucii neizvestnogo avtografa // Muzykal'naya akademiya. 2007. № 1. S. 48–60.

Digonskaya O.G. YAvorskij // Shostakovich v Leningradskoj konservatorii. 1919–1930. Sost. Lyudmila Kovnackaya. V 3 tomah. SPb., 2013. T. 2. S. 87–107.

Dmitrij Shostakovich v pis'mah i dokumentah [Sbornik] / Gos. centr. muzej muzyk. kul'tury im. M.I. Glinki. Red.-sost.: I.A. Bobykina. M.: Gos. centr. muzej muzyk. kul'tury im. M.I. Glinki: Antikva, 2000.

Evdokimova YU.K., Simakova N.A. Muzyka ehpohi Vozrozhdeniya. Cantus prius factus i rabota s nim. M.: Muzyka, 1982.

Pis'ma k drugu: Dmitrij Shostakovich – Isaaku Glikmanu / Sost. i komment. I.D. Glikmana. M.–SPb.: DSCH: Kompozitor, 1993.

Sapozhnikov S.R. Moj Shostakovich. M.: Izd. artisticheskogo obshchestva «Assamblei iskusstv», 2006.

Sokolov N.A. Imitacii na Cantus firmus. Posobie pri izuchenii kontrapunkta strogogo stilya. L.: Izdanie Gosudarstvennoj konservatorii, 1928.

Fel'de V.G. Oppoziciya «svoj – chuzhoj» v kul'ture. Dis ... kand. filosofskih nauk: 09.00.13. Omsk, 2015.

Hentova S.M. V mire Shostakovicha: [Sbornik]. M.: Kompozitor, 1996.

Civ'yan T.V. Model' mira i ee lingvisticheskie osnovy. M.: KomKniga, 2006.

Chigareva E.I. Chto takoe aforizm v muzyke? Ot Dmitriya SHostakovicha k Al'fredu Shnitke // Muzykal'noe obrazovanie v kontekste kul'tury: Voprosy teorii, istorii i metodologii. Materialy H Mezhdunarodnoj konferencii 1–3 noyabrya 2010 goda / RAM im. Gnesinyh. M., 2012. S.181–192.

[Shostakovich D.D.] Anketa po psihologii tvorcheskogo processa // Dmitrij SHostakovich v pis'mah i dokumentah / Red.-sost. I.A. Bobykina; Nauch. red. L.V. Esipova, M.P. Rahmanova. M.: RIF Antikva, 2000. S. 470–481.

Shostakovich D.D. Otchet o rabote aspiranta Leningradskoj gosudarstvennoj konservatorii Dmitriya Shostakovicha // Sovetskaya muzyka. 1986. № 10. S. 54–55.

Shostakovich D.D. Pis'ma k I.I. Sollertinskomu. SPb.: Kompozitor, 2006




Copyright (c) 2017 Larissa L. Gerver

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/