A Fugue as Art: Between Form and Metamorphoses

Maya I. Shinkareva

Abstract


The article explores the informative value of the most common oppositions “typical vs. individual”, “traditional vs. unique”, “stable vs. dynamic” for the study of evolutionary processes in music. The dichotomous method helps to reveal the dialectic of the general and the individual. On top of that, it is instrumental in discovering new approaches and meanings behind them. At the same time, the concepts of “typical”, “traditional”, and “stable” are understood as a generally accepted, recognizable (at the level of a compositional solution), essential and basic property of the form, while the concept of “metamorphosis” is understood as something special, changeable and non-conventional.

The study focuses on the fugue as the key polyphonic form commonly perceived as the embodiment of strict traditions of academicism and, to a certain degree, of conservatism. At the same time, the fugue effectively demonstrates the interaction of technical and aesthetic aspects of the archetype and its numerous stylistic modifications. This is extremely important as regards studies into the evolution of the fugue and the discovery of its internally open and creative nature.

Examples of fugues in various composing practices—from the heyday of the Baroque to the present day—show metamorphoses as an organic process that naturally permeates the entire history of the form. Diverse and sometimes paradoxical compositional solutions of the fugue provide a ground to supplement the above list of antonymic pairs with one more opposition: “morph vs. metamorphosis” (“morph” is a Greek word for “form”). This opposition makes it possible to identify the relations between different compositional and structural units of the invariant form and their variants in a modified form.

Keywords: fugue, form, metamorphosis, dichotomous method, stable, mobile, conventional approach

For citation: Shinkareva M. I. A Fugue as Art: Between Form and Metamorphoses [Electronic source]. In: Sovremennye problemy muzykoznaniya / Contemporary Musicology, 2022, no. 2, pp. 159–171. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.56620/2587-9731-2022-2-159-171


References


Bulez P. Neobhodimost esteticheskogo [The Necessity of the Aesthetic]. In: Muzyikalnoe obozrenie [Musical Review]. 1986. No. 7. Pp. 46–79.

Gerver L.L. O temah i tematicheskih sochetaniyah v instrumentalnyih fugah Mozarta [On themes and thematic combinations in Mozart's instrumental fugues]. In: Uchenyie zapiski Rossiyskoy akademii muzyki imeni Gnesinyh [Scientific notes of Gnessin Russian Academy of Music]. 2012. No. 2. Pp. 42–54.

Dubrovskaya T.N. Polifoniya: Uchebnik dlya vysshey shkoly [Polyphony: A textbook for higher education]. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proekt [Academic project], 2008.

Klimovitsky A.I., Selivanov V.V. Bethoven i filosofskaya revolyutsiya v Germanii [Beethoven and the Philosophical Revolution in Germany]. In: Voprosy teorii i estetiki muzyki. Vyp. 10 [Questions of Theory and Aesthetics of Music. Issue 10]. Leningrad: Muzyka [Music], 1971. Pp. 19– 230.

Rolland R. Bolshaya sonata, op. 106 [Grand Sonata, op. 106]. In: Sovetskaya muzyka [Soviet music]. 1970. No. 2. Pp. 75–89.

Simakova N.A. Kontrapunkt strogogo stilya i fuga. Kniga vtoraya. Fuga: ee logika i poetika [Strict style counterpoint and fugue. Book two. Fugue: its logic and poetics]. M.: Moskovskaya konservatoriya, Kompozitor [Moscow Conservatory, Composer], 2011.

Shulgin D.I. Godyi neizvestnosti Alfreda Shnitke. Besedy s kompozitorom [The years of obscurity Alfred Schnittke. Conversations with the composer]. M.: Delovaya Liga [Business League], 1993.

Schumann R. Shest prelyudiy i fug dlya fortepiano Mendelsona [Mendelssohn’s six preludes and fugues for piano]. In: Izbrannyie stati o muzyke [Selected articles about music]. M.: Muzyka [Music], 1956. Pp. 201.

Milhaud D. Notes sans musique. Paris: Fajurd, 1949.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.56620/2587-9731-2022-2-159-171

Copyright (c) 2022 Maya I. Shinkareva

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/