Why americans so love Schenker (and Riemann even more)

Philip Ewell

Abstract


In the history of music theory in the 20th century, two figures stand out above all others: Heinrich Schenker and Hugo Riemann. In Russia Riemann’s conceptions have dominated, while in the United States Schenker is preeminent. However, there are strong undercurrents of Schenkerian theory in Russia and Riemannian theory in America.

In this article the author contextualizes these two figures by examining their reception in Russia and America and by explaining how both countries currently understand the legacy of these two authors.

Among the main followers of Schenker in Russiaб the author distinguishes Yu. Kholopov (he wrote a number of articles on Schenker's theory, as well as the book «The Musical and Theoretical System of Heinrich Schenker»), B. Plotnikov, who translated Schenker's «Der freie Satz» into Russian and E. Lagutina, who wrote the dissertation «Heinrich Schenker and his “Harmonielehre”».

In the United States, such scientists as G. Weiss, O. Jonas, E. Oster, F. Salzer, and K. Shakhtar played a key role in the dissemination of Schenker theory. Thanks to them and other authors, almost all of Schenker's works were translated into English, the most important articles and books about him and his works were written, journals devoted to Schenker's ideas were founded, scientific conferences were organized, teaching of music theory based on his ideas began.

The ideas of Riemann in Russia were transmitted through the works of G. Catoire («Теоретический курс гармонии» [«The Theoretical Course of Harmony»]), I. Dubovsky, S. Evseev and I. Methodin («Учебник гармонии» [«Textbook of Harmony»]), B. Yavorsky (translation of Riemann’s «Systematische Modulationslehre als Grundlage der musikalischen Formenlehre»).

In America, Riemann’s harmonious theories were ignored for a long time until the work of David Lewin came out in the 1980s: «A Formal Theory of Generalized Tonal Functions», «Generalized Musical Intervals and Transformations», and «Some Notes on Analyzing Wagner: The Ring and Parsifal». Lewin was one of the initiators of the creation in the USA of a new school of harmonic analysis («Neo-Riemannian Theory»), which arose as a reaction to the prevailing Schenker system.

Currently, most American harmony textbooks are based on Schencker's theories. But there are also new publications, for example, «Harmony in Context» by M. Roig-Francoli and «Concise Introduction to Tonal Harmony» by J. Strauss and P. Burstin, based on the ideas of Riemann.

Keywords: Heinrich Schenker, Hugo Riemann, music theory, harmony,musical analysis, step theory, function theory, history of music theory,American music theory

References


Akopyan L.O. Po sledam SHenkera: Redukcionizm [EHlektronnyj resurs] // Iskusstvo muzyki. Teoriya i istoriya. № 6 (2012). S. 104–124. URL: http://imti.sias.ru/upload/iblock/087/akopyan.pdf.

Asaf'ev B.V. Muzykal'naya forma kak process. V 2-h t. 2-oe izd. L.: Muzyka, 1947 [1971]. T. 2.

Vlasova N.O. Genrih SHenker i ego analiticheskaya teoriya [EHlektronnyj resurs] // Iskusstvo muzyki. Teoriya i istoriya. № 6 (2012). S. 86–102. URL: http://imti.sias.ru/upload/iblock/bc8/vlasova.pdf.

Zaharov YU.K. Teoriya G. SHenkera v Rossii [EHlektronnyj resurs] // CHelovek i kul'tura. 2016. № 2. S. 91–101. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/ca/article_19008.html.

Zaharov YU.K. Dopolnenie k SHenkeru: linearno-garmonicheskij analiz dvuh pesen R. SHumana // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Vo-prosy teorii i praktiki. 2015. № 2(52). CH. 1. C. 78–86.

Katuar G.L. Teoreticheskij kurs garmonii. M.: Gosudarstvennoe Izdatel'stvo muzykal'nyj sektor, 1924.

Klimentova L.S. Odnotercovye otnosheniya v garmonii. Dis. … kand. iskusstvovedeniya: 17.00.02. Nizhnij Novgorod, 2014.

Lagutina E.V. Genrih SHenker i ego «Uchenie o garmonii». Dis. … kand. iskusstvovedeniya. V 2-h t. M., 2014.

Mazel' L.A. O rasshirenii ponyatiya odnoimennoj tonal'nosti // Sovetskaya muzyka. 1957. № 2. S. 141–145.

Mazel' L.A. K diskussii o sovremennoj garmonii // Sovetskaya muzyka. 1962. № 5. S. 52–61.

Plotnikov B.T. Monolog o praktike soderzhatel'nogo analiza: uch. posobie dlya muz. vuzov. Krasnoyarsk: KGAMiT, 2005.

Taneev S.I. Podvizhnoj kontrapunkt strogogo pis'ma. M.: YUr-genson, 1909 [1959].

Hannanov I.D. Teoriya garmonii YU.N. Holopova v sravnenii s sovremennymi amerikanskimi predstavleniyami o tonal'noj muzyke // Muzykal'nye miry YUriya Nikolaevicha Holopova / Sb. statej. M.: MGK, 2016. S. 88–95.

Holopov YU.N. Muzykal'no-teoreticheskaya sistema Hajnriha SHenkera. M.: Kompozitor, 2006.

Holopov YU.N. Muzykal'no-ehsteticheskie vzglyady H. SHenkera // EHsteticheskie ocherki. Vyp. 5. M.: Muzyka, 1979. S. 234–253.

Holopov YU.N., Kirillina L.V. i dr. Muzykal'no-teoreticheskie sistemy: uchebnik dlya istoriko-teoreticheskih i kompozitorskih fakul'tetov muz. vuzov. M.: Kompozitor, 2006.

SHeval'e L. Istoriya uchenij o garmonii / Per. s franc. Potapovoj i V. Taranushchenko. Pod red. M.V. Ivanova-Boreckogo. M.: Gos. muz. izd-vo, 1931 (1932).

SHenker G. Svobodnoe pis'mo. Novye muzykal'nye teorii i fan-tazii III / Per. B.T. Plotnikova. Krasnoyarsk, 2003. V 2-h t.

Bach C.P.E. Versuch über die wahre Art das Clavier zu spielen. Berlin, 1753.

Berry D. Hans Weisse and the Dawn of American Schenkerism // The Journal of Musicology. 2003. No. 20/1. P. 104–156.

Berry D. Schenkerian Theory in the United States // Zeitschrift der Gesellschaft für Musiktheorie. 2005. No. 2/2–3. S. 101–137.

Burns L. Analytic Methodologies for Rock Music: Harmonic and Voice-Leading Strategies in Tori Amos’s «Crucify» // Expression in Pop-Rock Music: Critical and Analytical Essays, revised second edition. Ed. by Walter Everett. New York: Routledge, 2008. P. 213–246.

Burstein P., Straus J. Concise Introduction to Tonal Harmony. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2015.

Cohn R. Introduction to Neo-Riemannian Theory: A Survey and Historical Perspective // Journal of Music Theory. 1998. Vol. 42. P. 167–180.

Cohn R. Maximally Smooth Cycles, Hexatonic Systems, and the Analysis of Late-Romantic Triadic Progressions // Music Analysis. 1996. No. 15. P. 9–40.

Cohn R. Neo-Riemannian Operations, Parsimonious Trichords, and Their Tonnetz Representations // Journal of Music Theory. 1997. No. 41. P. 1–66.

Dahlhaus C., Anderson J. a.o. Harmony [Electronic resource] // Oxford Music Online. URL: http://www.oxfordmusiconline.com/

Dill C. Rameau’s Imaginary Monsters: Knowledge, Theory, and Chromaticism in «Hippolyte et Aricie» // Journal of the American Musico-logical Society. 2002. Vol. 55, No. 3. P. 433–476.

Euler L. Tentamen novae theoriae musicae ex certissismis har-moniae principiis dilucide expositae. Saint Petersburg, 1739.

Everett W. Voice Leading and Harmony as Expressive Devices in Early Music of the Beatles: She Loves You // College Music Symposium. 1992. No. 32. P. 19–37.

Fux J.J. Gradus ad Parnassum. Vienna: Johann Peter van Ghelen, 1725.

Gollin E. Some Aspects of Three-dimensional Tonnetze // Journal of Music Theory. 1998. Vol. 42. P. 195–206.

Gollin E., Harrison D. The Oxford Handbook of Neo-Riemannian Music Theories. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

Gosman A. Rameau and Zarlino: Polemics in the «Traité de l’harmonie» // Music Theory Spectrum. 2000. Vol. 22, No. 1. P. 44–59.

Harrison D. Harmonic Function in Chromatic Music. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1994.

Hostinsky O. Die Lehre von den musikalischen Klängen. Prague: H. Dominicus, 1879.

Hyer B. Tonal Intuitions in «Tristan and Isolde». Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University, 1989.

Kirnberger J. Die Kunst des reinen Satzes. Berlin und Königsberg: G.J. Decker und G.L. Hartung, 1774.

Klumpenhouwer H. Remarks on American Neo-Riemannian Theory // Tijdschrift voor Muziektheorie. 2000. No. 5/3. P. 155–169.

Klumpenhouwer H. Some Remarks on the Use of Riemann Transformations // Music Theory Online. 1994. No. 0/9.

Lewin D. A Formal Theory of Generalized Tonal Functions // Journal of Music Theory. 1982. No. 26. P. 23–60.

Lewin D. Generalized Musical Intervals and Transformations. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, 1987.

Lewin D. Some Notes on Analyzing Wagner: The Ring and Parsifal // 19th-Century Music. 1992. No. 16. P. 49–58.

Lubin S. Techniques for the Analysis of Development in Middle-Period Beethoven. Ph.D. dissertation, New York University, 1974.

Martin N. Rameau’s Changing Views on Supposition and Suspension // Journal of Music Theory. 2012. Vol. 56. No. 2. P. 121–167.

McCreless P. An Evolutionary Perspective on Semitone Rela-tions in the Nineteenth Century // The Second Practice of Nineteenth-Century Tonality, edited by William Kinderman and Harald Krebs. Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press, 1996. P. 87–113.

Montagnier J.-P. Heavenly Dissonances: The Cadential Six-Four Chord in French Grand Motets and Rameau’s Theory of the Accord par Supposition // Journal of Music Theory. 2003. Vol. 47. No. 2. P. 305–323.

Nobile D. Voice Leading in Early Beatles Songs // Music Theory Online. 2011. No. 17/3.

Piston W. Harmony. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1941.

Riemann H. Skizze einer neuen Methode der Harmonielehre. Leipzig, 1880.

Riemann H. Systematische Modulationslehre als Grundlage der musikalischen Formenlehre. Hamburg, 1887.

Riemann H. Vereinfachte Harmonielehre oder die Lehre von den tonalen Funktionen der Akkorde. London and New York, 1893.

Roig-Francoli M. Harmony in Context. Second Edition. New York: McGraw Hill, 2011.

Rothstein W. The Americanization of Heinrich Schenker // In Theory Only. 1986. No. 9/1. P. 5–17.

Sechter S. Die Grundsätze der musikalischen Komposition. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel, 1853–54.

Schenker H. Das Meisterwerk in der Musik. Munich, 1925.

Schenker H. Der freie Satz (Free Composition). Trans. E. Oster. New York: Longman Inc., 1979.

Schenker H. Der Tonwille. Vienna, 1921–4.

Schenker H. Fünf Urlinie-Tafeln. Vienna, 1932.

Schenker H. Harmonielehre. Stuttgart, 1906.

Schenker H. Kontrapunkt: Cantus firmus und zweistimmiger Satz. Vienna, 1910; и Drei und mehrstimmiger Satz, Übergänge zum freien Satz. Vienna, 1922.

Schenker H. Rameau oder Beethoven? // Das Meisterwerk in der Musik. Vol. 3, 1930. S. 9–24.




Copyright (c) 2018 Philip Ewell

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/