Vasily Titov’s Two-choir Concertos in Light of Nikolai Diletsky’s Amplification Theory

Natalia Yu. Plotnikova

Abstract


Of special relevance in the research of Russian music of the Baroque period are the methods of analysis that appeal to the music theory textbooks of that time. This article examines for the first time the theory of amplification developed by Nikolai Diletsky in his treatise Musikiyskaya grammatika [Musical Grammar]: the most significant techniques are disclosed of expansion of composition, which include exact repetition and various types of varied repetition, including modal, metric-rhythmic and melodic transformations of the musical material. It is suggested that the models of the ascending and descending motion, according to Diletsky, the so-called ascents and descents, are also means of amplification. The main aim of the article is the study of the music of the most significant composer of the partesny style, Vasily Titov from the point of view of Diletsky’s theory. The main object of the research is provided by eight two-choir concertos by Titov, the scores of which have been compiled and edited by the author of the article and are presently being prepared for publication. In this work the techniques of expansion of composition are revealed and characterized, their similarities or differences with the examples offered in Musikiyskaya grammatika [Musical Grammar] are established. It is shown that the multitude of techniques of exposition and the development of the material in Titov’s music exceed the usual “tutorial” schemes. Thus, the composer seldom turns to precise repetition, instead, applying timbral-textural variation, including the chorale rule, i.e., antiphonal juxtaposition of the choruses, basing himself on simple or canonic imitations of the respective choruses. Melodic transformations, such as, for instance, inversions are not only given in consecutive juxtapositions with the prime versions, but also combining together the prime and inverted versions in simultaneous sounding. It is established that Titov expands the ambitus of the models of ascending motion suggested by Diletsky, and also makes broad use of the rule of mixing together the types of motion (mixta), forming his own synthetic models. In his artistic realization of the typified schemes, Titov makes use of harmonic and contrapuntal means in a masterful way, achieving great artistic results. The article is accompanied by music examples, which illustrate the theoretical positions.

Keywords: Vasily Titov, Nikolai Diletsky, Musikiyskaya grammatika [Musical Grammar], two-choir concertos, amplification, partesny style

For citation: Plotnikova, N. Yu. (2004). Vasily Titov’s Two-choir Concertos in Light of Nikolai Diletsky’s Amplification Theory. Contemporary Musicology, 8(4), 10–39. https://doi.org/10.56620/2587-9731-2024-4-010-039


References


Plotnikova, N. Yu. (2022). Towards the Biography of the Tsar’s Singing Clerk Vasily Titov: New Sources. St. Tikhon’s University Review. Problems of History and Theory of Christian Art, 48, 34–46. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15382/sturV202248.34-46

Plotnikova, N. Yu. (2016). Tvorchestvo masterov partesnogo stilya Vasiliya Titova i Nikolaya Dileckogo: novye otkrytiya i perspektivy izucheniya [The Work of the Masters of the Partesnoy Style Vasily Titov and Nikolay Diletsky: New Discoveries and Prospects for Study]. In N. Yu. Plotnikova (Ed.), Russian Musical Baroque: Research Trends and Prospects (Vol. 1, pp. 145–154). (In Russ.).

Alexandrina, A. V., Bulycheva, A. V. (2020) Concertos for 8 Voices by Vasily Titov, and the Composer Vasily Gusev. Journal of Moscow Conservatory, 11(4), 42–61. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26176/mosconsv.2020.43.4.004

Gatovskaya, E. E. (2022). Koncerty Vasilija Titova na chetyre golosa v kontekste russkoj horovoj kul'tury poslednej chetverti XVII – pervoj poloviny XVIII veka [Vasily Titov's Concertos for Four Voices in the Context of Russian Choral Culture of the Last Quarter of the 17th – First Half of the 18th Century]. [Unpublished cand. sci. dissertation (Art Studies)] (Vol. 2). The State Institute for Art Studies. (In Russ.).

Plotnikova, N. Yu. (2019). Polychoral Singing in Russia (Based on the Late 17th – 18th Century Manuscripts). Art Education and Science, 2, 25–35. https://doi.org/10.34684/hon.201902004

Gerasimova-Persidskaya, N. A. (1994). Russkaja muzyka XVII veka – vstrecha dvuh jepoh [Russian Music of the 17th Century: A Meeting of Two Eras]. Muzyka. (In Russ.).

Plotnikova, N. Yu. (2021). On Imitation Forms in the Four-part Divine Service (‘Difficult’) by Vasiliy Titov. Opera musicologica, 12(5), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.26156/OM.2020.12.5.004

Evdokimova Yu. K. (1983). Istorija polifonii [History of Polyphony] (Vol. 1). Muzyka. (In Russ.).

Viskova, I. V. (2020). Marcin Melczewski and Musical Grammar by Nikolay Diletsky. St. Tikhon’s University Review. Problems of History and Theory of Christian Art, 38, 51–61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15382/sturV202038.51-61

Gerasimova, I. V. (2010). Nikolaj Dileckij: tvorcheskij put' kompozitora XVII veka [Nikolai Diletsky: The Creative Path of the 17th Century Composer]. [Unpublished cand. sci. dissertation (Art Studies)]. Gnesin Russian Academy of Music. (In Russ.).

Lyzhov, G. I. Dmitrieva, E. O. (2016). Vidy kontrapunkta v “Musikijskoj grammatike” Nikolaya Dileckogo [Types of Counterpoint in Nikolay Diletsky’s Musical Grammar]. In N. Yu. Plotnikova (Ed.), Russian Musical Baroque: Research Trends and Prospects (Vol. 1, pp. 217–232). (In Russ.).

Chernova, E. E. (2016). Rannee zapadnoevropejskoe i russkoe barokko: k probleme autentichnosti analiticheskikh metodov [Early Western European and Russian Baroque: On the Authenticity of Analytical Methods]. In N. Yu. Plotnikova (Ed.), Russian Musical Baroque: Research Trends and Prospects (Vol. 1, pp. 261–271). (In Russ.).

Protopopov, Vl. V. (1989). Russkaja mysl’ o muzyke v XVII veke [Russian Thought on Music in the 17th Century]. Muzyka. (In Russ.).

Gatovskaya, E. E. (2018). Some Specific Features of Refrain Forms in Concertos for Four Voices by Vasily Titov. St. Tikhon’s University Review. Problems of History and Theory of Christian Art, 31, 83–101. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15382/sturV201831.83-101




DOI: https://doi.org/10.56620/2587-9731-2024-4-010-039

Copyright (c) 2024 Natalia Yu. Plotnikova

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/