Immanuel Kant on Music: Paradoxes of Aesthetic Rationalism

Tatyana P. Razbeglova

Abstract


The article explores the reasons behind the inconsistency of Kant's perspective on the art of music. Kant’s aesthetics is a strict and harmonious system underpinning the analysis of aesthetic consciousness. His views produced a huge impact on the subsequent development of aesthetic thought. Despite certain contradictions, the Kantian philosophical system and, in particular, his aesthetic views are of timeless value. In this respect, it is paramount to explore these contradictions and understand their role in the Kantian philosophy. Kant was repeatedly reproached for his formal approach to aesthetics that disregards artistic practice. However, it was not criticism but, rather, direct apologetics of Kant's philosophical vision promoted among his followers that led to aesthetic formalism. In other words, the rationality of thinking was transferred on the very object of exploration—the art.

Kant's comments on music, as an integral part of his aesthetic theory, are formal and sparing. They contrast with a growing role of music in the cultural landscape at the turn of the 18th and 19th centuries and the scope of Kant’s commentary given to other arts. Nonetheless, the aesthetic value of music was still recognised as music was listed in Kant's classification of arts. Our research has concluded that the reasons behind Kant’s inconsistencies are not limited to the well-known gap between the aesthetic object and the judgment about it. Another reason is his conscious detachment from contemporary musical practice, and, more broadly, from the irrational essence of music which he implicitly felt. Kant's rejection of sensory and emotional perception of music in favor of its rational interpretation identified one of the key issues for the future research agenda in aesthetics. The question of whether it is possible to perceive music as a non-conceptual art with the help of rational thinking alone emerged from the contradictions of Kant's aesthetic. This issue has not lost its relevance. In fact, it has created the basis for modern transformations of musical art towards pronounced intellectualism.

The identification of the essence and grounds for Kant’s contradictions will allow to fend off accusations of formalism put forward by his followers and critics. 

Keywords: Kant, music, musical aesthetics, classification of arts, rationalism, affect, fine art

For citation: Razbeglova T. P. Immanuel Kant on Music: Paradoxes of Aesthetic Rationalism [Electronic source]. In: Sovremennye problemy muzykoznaniya / Contemporary Musicology, 2021, no. 4, pp. 79–94. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.56620/2587-9731-2021-4-079-094

 


References


Asmus V.F. Immanuil Kant [Immanuel Kant]. Moscow: Nauka [Science], 1973.

Vasyansky E.A.K. Immanuil Kant v poslednie gody zhizni [Immanuel Kant in the Last Years of his Life]. In: Kantovskij sbornik [Kant’s Collection]. 2012. №1. Pp. 100–114.

Hegel G.F. Jestetika. [Aesthetics]. In 4 volumes Vol. 2. / Transl. by B.G. Stolpner, Yu.N. Popov. Moscow: Iskusstvo [Art], 1971.

Herder J.G. Kalligona [Calligone]. In: Iogann Gotfrid Gerder Izbrannye sochinenija / Sostavitel’ V.I. Zhirmunskij [Johann Gottfried Herder. Selected Works / Compil. by V.I. Zhirmunsky] Moscow– Leningrad: Gosizdat. hudozhestvennoj literatury [State Publishing House of Fiction], 1956. Pp. 196–224.

Kant I. Kritika sposobnosti suzhdeniya [Criticism of Judgment]. In: Works: in 6 volumes. Vol. 5. Moscow: Mysl’ [Thought], 1966.

Kuznetsova I.S. Kant i muzyka [Kant and Music] // Kantovskij sbornik: Mezhvuz. temat. sb. nauch. tr. Vyp. 26. [Kant’s Collection: Interuniversity Thematic Collection of Scientific Papers. Issue 26]. Kaliningrad: Izd-vo RGU im. I. Kanta [Publishing House of the Russian State University named after Immanuel Kant], 2006. Pp. 220–236.

Kucherenko A.V. Protivorechie vnutri kantovskogo ponjatija «Jesteticheskoe suzhdenie vkusa» v svete transversal’noj filosofii [Contradiction within Kant's concept of “Aesthetic judgment of taste” in the light of transversal philosophy]. In: Vestnik Vyatgu. 2010. №4. Pp. 32–37.

Leibniz G.W. Nachala prirody i blagodati, osnovannye na razume [Principles of Nature and Grace Based on Reason]. In: Leibniz G.W. Sobranie sochinenij v chetyrekh tomah. T. 1. [Collection of Works in Four Volumes. Vol. 1.]. Moscow: Thought, 1982. Pз. 404–412.

Muzykal'naja jestetika Germanii XIX veka: v 2-h t. T. 1. Antologija [Musical Aesthetics of Germany of the 20 Century: in 2nd vol. Vol. 1. Anthology] / Compil. by A.V. Mikhailov, V.P. Shestakov, ed. by N.G Shakhnazarova. Moscow: Muzyka [Music], 1981. Pp. 74–81.

Nikitina L.V. Jevoljucija vzgljadov I. Kanta na muzykal’noe iskusstvo [Evolution of I. Kant’s Views on Musical Art]. In: Bulletin of Moscow State Institute of Culture. 2009. №5. Pp. 56–59.

Filosofskaja teorija muzyki. Immanuil Kant (1724–1804) [Philosophical Theory of Music. Immanuel Kant (1724–1804)]. In: Muzykal’naja jestetika Germanii XIX veka. V 2-h t. [Musical Aesthetics of Germany of the 20 Century: in 2nd vol. Vol. 1. Anthology] / Compil. by A.V. Mikhailov, V.P. Shestakov, ed. by N.G Shakhnazarova. Moscow: Muzyka [Music], 1981. Pp. 74–81.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.56620/2587-9731-2021-4-079-094

Copyright (c) 2021 Tatyana P. Razbeglova

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/